Why I hate SJW's and Anita Sarkeesian (rant ahead)

13 min read

Deviation Actions

mortalshinobi's avatar
Published:
3.5K Views
Alright, normally I don't use a journal to write about my dislikes of people like anita sarkeesian and leave it to ones like :icon345rv5: to do it, but I tire of cowardly sjw's like julianneknight who when you disagree with her starts calling you a mysoginist and sock puppet. (warning long rant ahead) You can view the debates with her not just from me, but from others as well on her image here- <da:thumb id="503690402"/>    where she strawman's the opposition and goes about adoring anita.  (you may want to check soon too as she may decide to delete the commentary to erase the evidence.)
Okay, I'll start with the bigger issue, the sjw's.  not anita sarkeesian, but her supporters.  When supporters of anita sarkeesian go off and threaten people and ruin the most important day of their career and possibly life, then as a supporter of anita, you're doing something wrong.
when people like greatkingrat88 and julianneknight support ruining someone's most important moment because they wore the wrong shirt then I get very po'd.     what is wrong with this shirt mind you? it's freaking black widow on the shirt over and over! who cares?! oh wait, feminist radicals who are insecure with themselves.
and when things like this are ignored
- because someone like thunderfoot is a "mysoginist pig" then there's a problem.  the video itself undoes anita's "special privledges of white male gamers" video by this man threatening thunderfoot with harm for being male, threatening things like "tearing off his dick and smashing it to the ground." yup, anita, men won't be disparaged or threatened based on their gender.  :icontwilightclapplz:
So do tell me, why should threats against anita be more valid than threats against one of her critics? do tell me what rational there is? because she's a woman isn't sufficient.
these are just two of my problems with sjw's.
my others are like with julianne knight, that when she gives you a huge massive text of speech when you try to reply, you find yourself blocked when she's asking for evidence on what you told her.  so there's no way to give these sjw's evidence if you're blocked from contacting them. sjw's claim when you show evidence and give your points, you're harrassing them yet you're supposed to allow them to have their evidence.  then like anita, they get block happy cuz you disagree with their precious mentality.  You know, when people disagree with me cuz I do fatality art on morrigan or chun li i don't block em. I let them make their points, as many as they want and stand my ground on why i can or can't do the art I do.  I don't run away like a coward. And I don't get pissed off at people who don't think like me.
next, the assumption that if a woman disagrees with radical feminist and anita then she is self interalizing mysogyny and she is a white man's sock puppet, and I specify white man, because that's what sjw's believe all men who disagree with them are. otherwise, why would anita's video be "privledges of the "white" male gamer"?  well here's a something for all sjw's out there, I'm not white. I'm a minority.  I don't bitch about the fact that the only good hispanic representation in comics and movies is zorro. cuz blue beatle? el fuerte? stereotyped flat loser characters. zorro is the only good hispanic and do i whine there aren't more hispanics in gaming and movies? no. I don't need it. I'm okay with what there is.
Then there is the double standards of feminist. A woman can go around looking like she's naked and should be respected, but a guy who wears a shirt with a woman in leather is objectifying them? oh nos! or the argument that guys aren't sexualized, that it's a power fantasy only for men.  here's a word for you, it isn't.  when a man takes his shirt off and looks all buff there's tons of women who go sexualizing him and objectifying him and saying all men should look like that. and when a woman is flaunting her sexuality several women look to her as a power fantasy wondering what it'd be like to be her! how many women love black widow and wonder woman and catwoman? these very sexualized but powerful women? it's the same thing as people fantasizing about kenpachi, kratos or batman. there is no difference. the only difference is guys won't whine about the male sexualization out there and say, yeah, power trip, no problem seeing it that way. but that power trip is sexualization sjw's.  and men get posed in equally ridiculous poses as women, just again, men don't whine about it.
Then there is the argument that feminism is egalitarianism.  no, it isn't. it's promoting women's rights primarily over men, except in court a woman will get a smaller punishment for a crime than will a man doing the same crime.  a woman won't be considered as seriously in cases of abuse and a woman will be given special priveledges in a good deal of cases in relation to custody even if the father has evidence they could be the better parent. feminist by and large don't want to correct this.  they want to keep this inequality.  if you're a feminist who wants to correct the court to help it actually be fair to both sexes then you're not the typical radical feminist and i support you.
then there's the sjw mindset of censoring anyone who disagrees to the point of trying to force major companies to comply with their terrorism and shut reasonable projects.  case in point, the sarkeesian effect video being made about radical feminism.  radcial feminist and sjw's have threatened the patreon creator to get the project shut down and block the donations for the video because it doesn't fit their narrative of how things should be. wait, so it's fine that anita is doing controversial videos about the points in gaming but it's not fine a guy does a documentary about the controversial nature of feminism? nice double standard there!

so my problem with sjw's-
1- double standards
2- ignorance of the errors of their idols
3- men don't need rights and want to promote female bias in the courts
4- consider debates to be harrassment
5- run and hide like cowards when a debate doesn't go their way
6- turning nonissues like someone's shirt into issues
7- think only women are sexualized and men in the same position are "power trips"
8- don't think women can think for themselves and think women who don't agree with them are internalized mysoginist and sock puppets
9- make assumptions anyone who disagrees with them is a white privledged male
10- equate radical feminism to be egalitarianism when it's about female superiority in the way they promote it. emphasis on the "radical".
11- ignore threats and doxing of those who are against them but whine about harassment to their side and will even support and promote it when done by their side.
12- treat their sjw ideals to such an extreme it's comparable to religious fanatics
13- promote censorship of free speech and thought
14- go out of their way to stop projects that counter their arguments like the sarkeesian effect even threatening law suits for it.

now most of those listed are covered under the issue of double standards, but might as well mark those down so people are aware

so people ask now, what is my problem with anita herself? why do you care?
welp, I didn't really before.  she was small fry talking stupid about women in movies no matter their role, but here are some things even outside gaming that i have issue with.

first, i started having issue with her, because she was one of those saying "gamers are dead" and irevelent.  she says this because she isn't a gamer, which has been shown in multiple rebuttals, but if you want to hear it from her mouth- here-
she wants to control the gaming culture and where games go and doesn't want to consolidate issues into something with more diversity but a narrow minded approach. in her video debating "true grit" the movie, she goes on about how the main allowed herself to be sucked into patriarchy and whined about why the character wanted to do kill the killer of her father rather than forgive him as shown here, on her own video-
while supposedly promoting a video series of veronica mars she promotes the illegal distrubution of the hacking and torrenting of the videos thus denying the actors and producers their credit for the series she's supposedly promoting -


she starts making wide statements of people based on their genders and blames a school shooting on internalized male masculinity and poison.
 and everyone by now should be aware of the loads of errors in her tropes vs women videos where not only is she nitpicking points in the videos to prove her point, but over generalizing why it is happening, not taking into account a woman in the same situation would do this as well and not giving counter arguments of what is being done right.  she makes blanket statements that there are no examples of the things being done right and heavily implies no games have female leads or playables that are avaialable to players who aren't weak or needing a man.
then of course is her lies about the video releases themselves.  how long has it been since she announced the "fighting fuck toys" video where she discussed the issues with fighting games of which I feel well versed as i'ved played fighting games since i was 7? well over six months now. so much for her releasing her videos in a year.
she also uses sexual markers to make herself more appealing to viewers and uses the damsel in distress ploy to garner 400,000 for not appearing in her utah meeting because it benefits her yet she argues against these very points in her videos. hypocricy much?
she has been noted of insulting the japanese and implying that they have no rights for women more than once-
and in her videos of males being responsible it becomes very obvious that while she says she's proequality, she is a misandrist and biggot. YOu can't say you don't hate men when you keep on blaming things on patriarchy and male masculinity.
and like her sjw friends, while claiming she wants discussion, blocks discussion and even shows off when people who have probably broken down her videos, like mr. repzion, that they are harassers who are giving her heart ache and that they are trolls. no, anita. when someone debates your points, they aren't harassing you, they are debunking ridiculous points and showing the error in them.
there is also the point that she abuses the fair use policy and steals work from lets players and more importantly, artist, like the art piece she was using on her feminist frequency video on the title which the artist told her multiple times to take down and which anita ignored for the longest time. she finally did take it down, but why did it take so long? shouldn't she respect a user who says they don't want to be associated with her and remove the art work right away? it shows a level of arrogance that is very unbecoming.
so if you've gotten down here, here is my list of reasons i hate both anita sarkeesian and sjw's. their double standards while promoting equality are not only laughable but equate to dictatorship and such things should not be tolerated by anyone.

Skin code by NotLucy
© 2015 - 2024 mortalshinobi
Comments104
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
thormemeson's avatar
I hear you loud and clear these people whined about Attack on Titan's fascist undertones despite there being none from the main characters.